The broad aims of this course are twofold: first, is to consider the significant restraints that defamation law and associated causes of action place on what can be published by the media; and second, is to consider whether the extent and scope of such restraints are appropriate. These aims are pursued through a detailed comparative analysis of defamation law in Australia, the UK and the US, as well as by looking at many of the practical aspects of defamation law that contribute to its impact on media freedom. Particular focus is placed on questioning the appropriate balance between the protection of personal reputation and the media’s perceived role in a democratic society as both ‘watchdog’ and ‘bloodhound’.

None

The aim of the course is to ensure that you are familiar with the central principles of defamation law.

In particular, the broader goals of this course are: to consider the significant restraints that defamation law and associated causes of action place on what can be published by the media; and to consider whether the extent and scope of such restraints are appropriate.

These aims will be pursued through a detailed analysis of defamation law in Australia, along with some comparative material where appropriate. The course will equip students in both the theory and practice of this dynamic and complex area of media law. The focus will both on the underlying rationales for defamation law and on the development of key principles in the case law. There will be a focus on the challenge of new and social media to traditional principles and also discussion of the appropriate balancing of protection of reputation as against freedom of expression and information.